Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. Bernhardt
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION
COTTONWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER, No. CV 18-12-BU-SEH Plaintiff, ORDER VS. DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior; STEVE BULLOCK, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Montana; CAM SHOLLY, in his official capacity as Park Superintendent, Yellowstone National Park; LEANNE MARTEN, in her official capacity as Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service; NATIONAL PARK SERVICE; U.S. FOREST SERVICE; USDA-ANIMAL & PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE, Defendants.
On April 30, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction.' On May 1, 2020, the Court issued an Order? denying
Doe. 113. * Doc. 118.
the portion of Plaintiff's motion seeking a temporary restraining order for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b) and (c).’ A briefing schedule for the request for a preliminary injunction was established.‘ At 11:53 p.m. (MDT) on May 7, 2020, Plaintiff filed a second Motion for Temporary Restraining Order.’ All Defendants oppose.® Plaintiff argues its members “will experience immediate irreparable injury to their safety, scientific, conservation, aesthetic, and recreational interests in Yellowstone bison if a temporary restraining order is not issued that enjoins bison hazing on federal land before this Court can hold a hearing.” Declarations submitted in support of the motion state: I have plans to bike and hike in and around the Madison Arm on the Custer Gallatin National Forest on the west side of Yellowstone National Park on Sunday May 10th, 2020.8 ///
> See Doc. 118 at 3. * See Doc. 118 at 3. > Doc. 122. ° See Doc. 122 at 5. "Doc. 122 at 3. Doc. 124-1 at 2. i.
I am concerned about being injured or harassed by state and/or federal officials on ATVs, or on horseback that are hazing bison.’ I have plans to recreate on Forest Service land on the west side of Yellowstone National Park on Sunday, May 10th, 2020.!° Hazing of Yellowstone bison will ruin my recreational experience, either because I won’t be able to enjoy bison on national forest lands, or because I will have to watch them be unnecessarily hazed off forest land. The hazing is unnecessary according to the science, which the Government refuses to consider.'! This Court may issue a temporary restraining order without written or oral notice to the adverse party or its attorneys only if the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b) and (c) are fully met and satisfied and only if “specific facts in an affidavit or a verified complaint clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant before the adverse party can be heard in opposition.”
* Doc. 124-1 at 2. ' Doc. 124-2 at 2. "Doc. 124-2 at 2. 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1)(A). □□
Plaintiffs most recent motion fails for a second time to provide specific facts that meet the requirement of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1)(A), that it must clearly show its members will experience immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage if the Court does not issue a temporary restraining order. Plaintiff has not clearly shown that its members will suffer irreparable injury if a temporary restraining order is not issued.'? ORDERED: 1. The Motion for Temporary Restraining Order! is DENIED. 2. As noted in the Court’s Order of May 1, 2020," the Court will schedule a hearing on Plaintiffs pending requests for a preliminary injunction!® by further order of DATED this & day of May, 2020.
SAM E. HADDON United States District Judge
° See Slaughter v. Nat’l Park Serv., 2019 WL 6465093, at *4—5 (D. Mont. Dec. 2, 2019). '* Doc. 122. 'S See Doc. 118. See Doc. 113 and 122. af.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. Bernhardt (Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. Bernhardt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.