Cotton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cotton v. State

120 S.W. 432, 56 Tex. Crim. 553, 1909 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 316

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cotton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 Tex. Crim. 55 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 19, 1909·No. No. 4118.·Published

Opinions

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25 and twenty days imprisonment in the county jail.

The Assistant Attorney-General moves to strike out the statement of facts in this case on the ground that same was not filed in the court below. Upon an examination same discloses no file mark upon the statement of facts. Accordingly the motion to strike out is - sustained. In the absence of statement of facts there is nothing in this record requiring a review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25 and twenty days imprisonment in the county jail.

The Assistant Attorney-General moves to strike out the statement of facts in this case on the ground that same was not filed in the court below. Upon an examination same discloses no file mark upon the statement of facts. Accordingly the motion to strike out is - sustained. In the absence of statement of facts there is nothing in this record requiring a review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cotton v. State, 120 S.W. 432, 56 Tex. Crim. 553, 1909 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 316 (Tex. 1909).

Pincite

120 S.W. 432 (Cotton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.