Cotton v. State

43 Tex. 169
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 43 Tex. 169 (Cotton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cotton v. State, 43 Tex. 169 (Tex. 1875).

Opinion

Roberts, Chief Justice.

The defense set up in this case was that the particular transaction charged in the indictment, and for which the grand jury intended to indict the defendant, was not that which was proved oil the [170]*170trial. The court declined to recognize defendant’s right to institute an inquiry into the intention of the grand jury further than as expressed in the indictment found by them. This was correct, .as formerly held by this court. (Grain v. The State, 14 Tex., 634.) We find no error in the case.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Dailey
79 S.E. 668 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1913)
Johnson v. State
2 S.W. 609 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1886)
Hart v. State
15 Tex. Ct. App. 202 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 Tex. 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cotton-v-state-tex-1875.