Cotton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cotton v. State

232 S.W.3d 602, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1215, 2007 WL 2471519

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 4, 2007·No. ED 88070·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Marvin Cotton, appeals the motion court’s denial, following an eviden-tiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order and judgment denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Marvin Cotton, appeals the motion court’s denial, following an eviden-tiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order and judgment denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Cotton v. State, 232 S.W.3d 602, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1215, 2007 WL 2471519 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

232 S.W.3d 602 (Cotton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.