Cotton v. State
This text of 652 So. 2d 1260 (Cotton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cornelius COTTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Nada M. Carey, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., William J. Bakstran, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
ERVIN, Judge.
The trial court erroneously considered appellant's juvenile adjudications of delinquency as predicate offenses to support a habitual offender sentence. Shook v. State, 603 So.2d 617 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Gahley v. State, 605 So.2d 1309 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). We reverse and remand for resentencing.
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
652 So. 2d 1260, 1995 WL 150493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cotton-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.