Cotton v. State

652 So. 2d 1260, 1995 WL 150493
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 1995·No. 94-377·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

652 So.2d 1260 (1995)

Cornelius COTTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 94-377.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 7, 1995.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Nada M. Carey, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., William J. Bakstran, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

ERVIN, Judge.

The trial court erroneously considered appellant's juvenile adjudications of delinquency as predicate offenses to support a habitual offender sentence. Shook v. State, 603 So.2d 617 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Gahley v. State, 605 So.2d 1309 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). We reverse and remand for resentencing.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cotton v. State, 652 So. 2d 1260, 1995 WL 150493 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

652 So. 2d 1260 (Cotton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. J.M.
824 So. 2d 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Wilson v. State
696 So. 2d 528 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)