Cotton v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Cotton v. State

133 So. 65, 24 Ala. App. 219, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 216

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 17, 1931

Docket8 Div. 212.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 133 So. 65 (Cotton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cotton v. State, 133 So. 65, 24 Ala. App. 219, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 216 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

The evidence without dispute shows that defendant operated; a motor vehicle in this state without having paid the license required by law.. Defendant, claimed that he’ *220 was not the owner of the car,'but used it and paid rent for same to the owner. This would render defendant liable. Acts 1927, pp. 139, 160, § 19.

The provisions of the act, supra, section 19, are defensive matter which must be proven by defendant on the trial in order that he may have the benefit of the exemption.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI