Cotton v. Parker

1 S. & M. 125
CourtMississippi Chancery Courts
DecidedJanuary 15, 1844
StatusPublished

This text of 1 S. & M. 125 (Cotton v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Chancery Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cotton v. Parker, 1 S. & M. 125 (Mich. Super. Ct. 1844).

Opinion

By the Chancellor.

A petition for a rehearing will never be allowed, unless the rule requiring two respectable counsel to certify that they have examined the papers and think the case should bp reinvestigated, has been complied with. In such case I should, as a general rule, however well satisfied I might be with my former opinion, not hesitate to grant a reargument. It is not, in any case, a matter of right; but in the exercise of that discretion with which I am clothed, I shall never jirevent the fullest discussion, or refuse to hear additional argument, where, In the manner and under the guards prescribed by the rule on that subject, it is requested of me.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 S. & M. 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cotton-v-parker-misschanceryct-1844.