Cotton v. Francis

Fourth Circuit

Cotton v. Francis

303 F. App'x 161

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2008·No. No. 08-6661·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Vernarde Cotton, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Cotton’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cotton v. Francis, No. 3:06-cv-90031-FPS-JES, 2007 WL 777104 (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 12, 2007) & 2008 WL 857765 (Mar. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Vernarde Cotton, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Cotton’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cotton v. Francis, No. 3:06-cv-90031-FPS-JES, 2007 WL 777104 (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 12, 2007) & 2008 WL 857765 (Mar. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cotton v. Francis, 303 F. App'x 161 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

303 F. App'x 161 (Cotton v. Francis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related