Cotton v. Francis
This text of 303 F. App'x 161 (Cotton v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Vernarde Cotton, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Cotton’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cotton v. Francis, No. 3:06-cv-90031-FPS-JES, 2007 WL 777104 (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 12, 2007) & 2008 WL 857765 (Mar. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
303 F. App'x 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cotton-v-francis-ca4-2008.