Cotton States Mutual Ins. v. Trevethan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cotton States Mutual Ins. v. Trevethan

358 So. 2d 121, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15836

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 4, 1978·No. No. FF-422·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the briefs and arguments of counsel, we determine the judgment entered was supported by competent and substantial evidence. Additionally, having relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for the purpose of permitting an interview of the jurors in this cause and of determining whether a juror was guilty of such misconduct for which the verdict may be attacked, we conclude, after reviewing the proceedings, there was no misconduct which would justify setting aside the verdict.

Accordingly the judgment is in all respects AFFIRMED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the briefs and arguments of counsel, we determine the judgment entered was supported by competent and substantial evidence. Additionally, having relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for the purpose of permitting an interview of the jurors in this cause and of determining whether a juror was guilty of such misconduct for which the verdict may be attacked, we conclude, after reviewing the proceedings, there was no misconduct which would justify setting aside the verdict.

Accordingly the judgment is in all respects AFFIRMED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Cotton States Mutual Ins. v. Trevethan, 358 So. 2d 121, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15836 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

358 So. 2d 121 (Cotton States Mutual Ins. v. Trevethan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related