Cotton Belt Insurance v. State
This text of 392 So. 2d 34 (Cotton Belt Insurance v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The unilateral filing by the state of new informations, which merely recast the offenses already alleged in an earlier indictment and informations, did not affect the viability of the first set of charging documents, which were not dismissed or quashed, and therefore did not result in a discharge of the appearance bond posted with respect to them. See, State v. Adjmi, 170 So.2d 340, 343 (Fla.3d DCA 1964); compare, All Florida Surety Co. v. State, 78 So.2d 89 (Fla.1955); Wilcox v. State, 248 So.2d 692 (Fla.4th DCA 1971). The order under review is therefore
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
392 So. 2d 34, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cotton-belt-insurance-v-state-fladistctapp-1980.