Cotto v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cotto v. State

433 So. 2d 1032, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20248

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 8, 1983·No. No. 82-2715·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pedro Delgado Cotto appeals his judgment and sentence for burglary of a dwelling. While we find no substantive merit in this appeal, we note that the lower court erred in imposing court costs against Cotto, who earlier had been adjudged indigent.

Accordingly, we strike the costs of $10 and $2 assessed against appellant under sections 960.20 and 943.25(4), Florida Statutes (1981). See Brown v. State, 427 So.2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Except as set forth above, we affirm the judgment and sentence.

GRIMES, A.C.J., RYDER, J., and HAN-LON, MORTON, J., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Pedro Delgado Cotto appeals his judgment and sentence for burglary of a dwelling. While we find no substantive merit in this appeal, we note that the lower court erred in imposing court costs against Cotto, who earlier had been adjudged indigent.

Accordingly, we strike the costs of $10 and $2 assessed against appellant under sections 960.20 and 943.25(4), Florida Statutes (1981). See Brown v. State, 427 So.2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Except as set forth above, we affirm the judgment and sentence.

GRIMES, A.C.J., RYDER, J., and HAN-LON, MORTON, J., Associate Judge, concur.

Cotto v. State, 433 So. 2d 1032, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20248 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

433 So. 2d 1032 (Cotto v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related