Cotto v. Lord

Second Circuit

Cotto v. Lord

21 F. App'x 89

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 8, 2001

DocketNo. 01-2056

StatusPublished

This text of 21 F. App'x 89 (Cotto v. Lord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cotto v. Lord, 21 F. App'x 89 (2d Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of [90]*90January 10, 2001 be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Koeltl’s thorough opinion of January 10, 2001. See generally Cotto v. Lord, No. 99 Civ. 4874(JGK), 2001 WL 21246 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2001).

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of [90]*90January 10, 2001 be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Koeltl’s thorough opinion of January 10, 2001. See generally Cotto v. Lord, No. 99 Civ. 4874(JGK), 2001 WL 21246 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2001).

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 F. App'x 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cotto-v-lord-ca2-2001.