Cottle v. Wilkes

81 S.E. 201, 141 Ga. 499, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 19
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 11, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 81 S.E. 201 (Cottle v. Wilkes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cottle v. Wilkes, 81 S.E. 201, 141 Ga. 499, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 19 (Ga. 1914).

Opinion

Hill, J.

The evidence in this ease being sufficient to authorize the judge to find that the act complained of was a public nuisance on the public highway, he did not abuse his discretion in granting an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices' concur, except AtTcmson, J., dissenting. ' Smith & Griggs, for plaintiff in error. J. S. Bidgill and 8. F. Mitchell, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Georgia Public Service Commission v. Saye & Davis Transfer Co.
154 S.E. 439 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Schlesinger v. City of Atlanta
129 S.E. 861 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 S.E. 201, 141 Ga. 499, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cottle-v-wilkes-ga-1914.