Cottle v. Wilkes

81 S.E. 201, 141 Ga. 499, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 19
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 11, 1914·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

The evidence in this ease being sufficient to authorize the judge to find that the act complained of was a public nuisance on the public highway, he did not abuse his discretion in granting an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices' concur, except AtTcmson, J., dissenting. ' Smith & Griggs, for plaintiff in error. J. S. Bidgill and 8. F. Mitchell, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cottle v. Wilkes, 81 S.E. 201, 141 Ga. 499, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 19 (Ga. 1914).

81 S.E. 201 (Cottle v. Wilkes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Georgia Public Service Commission v. Saye & Davis Transfer Co.
154 S.E. 439 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Schlesinger v. City of Atlanta
129 S.E. 861 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)