Cottle v. Wade

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cottle v. Wade

64 S.E. 1007, 6 Ga. App. 314, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 275

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1909·No. 1651·Published

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. One who has filed a claim to the levy of a lien foreclosure can not successfully urge the point that the verdict finding the property subject is illegal because there was a misjoinder of parties plaintiff.

2. There was sufficient evidence to justify the jury in finding that the claimant bought the property with notice, either actual or constructive, of the lien of the plaintiffs. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

1. One who has filed a claim to the levy of a lien foreclosure can not successfully urge the point that the verdict finding the property subject is illegal because there was a misjoinder of parties plaintiff.

2. There was sufficient evidence to justify the jury in finding that the claimant bought the property with notice, either actual or constructive, of the lien of the plaintiffs. Judgment affirmed.

Cottle v. Wade, 64 S.E. 1007, 6 Ga. App. 314, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 275 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

64 S.E. 1007 (Cottle v. Wade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.