Cottle v. Wade

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cottle v. Wade

64 S.E. 1007, 6 Ga. App. 314, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 275

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 15, 1909

Docket1651

StatusPublished

This text of 64 S.E. 1007 (Cottle v. Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cottle v. Wade, 64 S.E. 1007, 6 Ga. App. 314, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 275 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. One who has filed a claim to the levy of a lien foreclosure can not successfully urge the point that the verdict finding the property subject is illegal because there was a misjoinder of parties plaintiff.

2. There was sufficient evidence to justify the jury in finding that the claimant bought the property with notice, either actual or constructive, of the lien of the plaintiffs. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

1. One who has filed a claim to the levy of a lien foreclosure can not successfully urge the point that the verdict finding the property subject is illegal because there was a misjoinder of parties plaintiff.

2. There was sufficient evidence to justify the jury in finding that the claimant bought the property with notice, either actual or constructive, of the lien of the plaintiffs. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 S.E. 1007, 6 Ga. App. 314, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cottle-v-wade-gactapp-1909.