Cottle v. Payne
3 Day 289
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut·Decided September 15, 1808·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The court will not exercise their discretion to tax costs against a prevailing plaintiff', except where he has knowingly brought forward an unfounded claim, or, in other words, where he must have known that he was not entitled to 500 dollars damages. In this case, the plaintiff might naturally and fairly suppose he was entitled to recover more than 500 dollars.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cottle v. Payne, 3 Day 289 (circtdct 1808).
3 Day 289 (Cottle v. Payne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lyon v. Adde
63 Barb. 89 (New York Supreme Court, 1872)
Hendricks v. Wallis
7 Iowa 224 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1858)