Cottingham v. Love
This text of 99 So. 907 (Cottingham v. Love) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellee, as a life tenant to an undivided interest in certain lands situated in Bibb county, filed this bill against appellants for a sale of said lands for division among the joint owners thereof. Appellants’ demurrer takes the point that such life tenant could not maintain a bill of this character. The life tenancy is as to a fractional interest in the land, and the demurrer to the bill was properly overruled, under the following, among other, authorities: McQueen v. Turner, 91 Ala. 273, 8 South. 863; Fitts v. Craddock, 144 Ala. 437, 39 South. 506, 113 Am. St. Rep. 53; Fies v. Rosser, 162 Ala. 504, 50 South. 287; Hollis v. Watkins, 181 Ala. 248, 61 South. 893; Jordan v. Walker, 201 Ala. 248, 77 South. 838; Wheat v. Wheat, 190 Ala. 461, 67 South. 417; Chapman v. York, 208 Ala. 274, 94 South. 90.
The decree of the court below will therefore be here affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 So. 907, 211 Ala. 152, 1924 Ala. LEXIS 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cottingham-v-love-ala-1924.