Home/Supreme Court/Cotter & Co. v. Brizendine

Cotter & Co. v. Brizendine

114 S. Ct. 2095, 511 U.S. 1103, 128 L. Ed. 2d 658, 62 U.S.L.W. 3772, 1994 U.S. LEXIS 3792
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 23, 1994
DocketNo. 93-1129
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 114 S. Ct. 2095 (Cotter & Co. v. Brizendine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cotter & Co. v. Brizendine, 114 S. Ct. 2095, 511 U.S. 1103, 128 L. Ed. 2d 658, 62 U.S.L.W. 3772, 1994 U.S. LEXIS 3792 (U.S. 1994).

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The petition for writ of certio-rari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the ease is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Security Services, Inc. v. Kmart Corporation, 511 U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 677, 126 L.Ed.2d 645 (1994).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re J.H. Ware Trucking
186 B.R. 935 (E.D. Missouri, 1995)
East Coast Intermodal Systems, Inc. v. Sea-Barge Group, Inc.
169 B.R. 451 (S.D. Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 S. Ct. 2095, 511 U.S. 1103, 128 L. Ed. 2d 658, 62 U.S.L.W. 3772, 1994 U.S. LEXIS 3792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cotter-co-v-brizendine-scotus-1994.