Cotten v. Wilkinson

720 N.E.2d 920, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1466, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3834
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 14, 1999
Docket99-1977
StatusPublished

This text of 720 N.E.2d 920 (Cotten v. Wilkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cotten v. Wilkinson, 720 N.E.2d 920, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1466, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3834 (Ohio 1999).

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. [1467]*1467Upon consideration of respondents’ answer,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
720 N.E.2d 920, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1466, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cotten-v-wilkinson-ohio-1999.