Cotte v. Clairol Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cotte v. Clairol Inc.

90 A.D.2d 765, 455 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18971

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 1, 1982·Published

Opinion

Appeal by defendant Clairol Incorporated, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Gurahian, J.), dated August 18, 1981, as denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. The record indicates the existence of triable issues of fact as to Clairol’s liability. O’Connor, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant Clairol Incorporated, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Gurahian, J.), dated August 18, 1981, as denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. The record indicates the existence of triable issues of fact as to Clairol’s liability. O’Connor, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cotte v. Clairol Inc., 90 A.D.2d 765, 455 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18971 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

90 A.D.2d 765 (Cotte v. Clairol Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.