Cotte v. Clairol Inc.
This text of 90 A.D.2d 765 (Cotte v. Clairol Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant Clairol Incorporated, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Gurahian, J.), dated August 18, 1981, as denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. The record indicates the existence of triable issues of fact as to Clairol’s liability. O’Connor, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 A.D.2d 765, 455 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cotte-v-clairol-inc-nyappdiv-1982.