Cottar v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cottar v. State

197 S.W. 987, 81 Tex. Crim. 659, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 251

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 28, 1917·No. No. 4370.·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This conviction was for violation of article 303, P. C., wherein appellant was convicted for exhibiting in *660 a place of amusement a moving picture show on Sunday. The majority of the court have held the law constitutional and valid in the Zucarro case, this day decided. I can npt concur in will write later for my non-concurrence and file in the Zucarro case. Under the authority of that case this judgment will be affirmed.

[Final dissenting opinion October 22, 1917. — Reporter.]

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This conviction was for violation of article 303, P. C., wherein appellant was convicted for exhibiting in *660 a place of amusement a moving picture show on Sunday. The majority of the court have held the law constitutional and valid in the Zucarro case, this day decided. I can npt concur in will write later for my non-concurrence and file in the Zucarro case. Under the authority of that case this judgment will be affirmed.

[Final dissenting opinion October 22, 1917. — Reporter.]

Affirmed.

Cottar v. State, 197 S.W. 987, 81 Tex. Crim. 659, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 251 (Tex. 1917).

Pincite

197 S.W. 987 (Cottar v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.