Cottar v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cottar v. State

197 S.W. 987, 81 Tex. Crim. 659, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 251

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 28, 1917

DocketNo. 4370.

StatusPublished

This text of 197 S.W. 987 (Cottar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cottar v. State, 197 S.W. 987, 81 Tex. Crim. 659, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 251 (Tex. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This conviction was for violation of article 303, P. C., wherein appellant was convicted for exhibiting in *660 a place of amusement a moving picture show on Sunday. The majority of the court have held the law constitutional and valid in the Zucarro case, this day decided. I can npt concur in will write later for my non-concurrence and file in the Zucarro case. Under the authority of that case this judgment will be affirmed.

[Final dissenting opinion October 22, 1917. — Reporter.]

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This conviction was for violation of article 303, P. C., wherein appellant was convicted for exhibiting in *660 a place of amusement a moving picture show on Sunday. The majority of the court have held the law constitutional and valid in the Zucarro case, this day decided. I can npt concur in will write later for my non-concurrence and file in the Zucarro case. Under the authority of that case this judgment will be affirmed.

[Final dissenting opinion October 22, 1917. — Reporter.]

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 S.W. 987, 81 Tex. Crim. 659, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cottar-v-state-texcrimapp-1917.