Cotroneo v. Sabatino
362 N.E.2d 259, 41 N.Y.2d 848, 41 N.Y. 848, 393 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 1891
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (50 AD2d 1081) and because that court correctly discerned that the liability of the defendant was unrelated to that of a manufacturer or distributor of the machine which caused the injury.
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cotroneo v. Sabatino, 362 N.E.2d 259, 41 N.Y.2d 848, 41 N.Y. 848, 393 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 1891 (N.Y. 1977).
362 N.E.2d 259 (Cotroneo v. Sabatino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Donuk v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
52 A.D.3d 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Grover v. Superior Welding, Inc.
1995 OK 14 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1995)
Zara v. Perzan
185 A.D.2d 236 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Erickson v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance
479 N.W.2d 552 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1991)