Cotnareanu v. National City Bank of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Cotnareanu v. National City Bank of New York

3 N.E.2d 451, 271 N.Y. 619, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1340

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 2, 1936

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 N.E.2d 451 (Cotnareanu v. National City Bank of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cotnareanu v. National City Bank of New York, 3 N.E.2d 451, 271 N.Y. 619, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1340 (N.Y. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The questions presented on this appeal are identical with the questions in Cotnareanu v. Chase National Bank (271 N. Y. 294), decided herewith. The orders should be modified in accordance with the opinion in that case and, as so modified, affirmed, with separate bills of costs in all courts to the appellants. The first question certified by the order granting leave to appeal to the defendant John F. Woods should be answered in the negative; the second question thereby certified should be answered in the affirmative. The second question certified by the order granting leave to appeal to the other defendants should be answered in the affirmative; the other questions thereby certified should be answered in the negative.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Crouch and Loughran, JJ., concur; Hgbbs and Finch, JJ., taking no part.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The questions presented on this appeal are identical with the questions in Cotnareanu v. Chase National Bank (271 N. Y. 294), decided herewith. The orders should be modified in accordance with the opinion in that case and, as so modified, affirmed, with separate bills of costs in all courts to the appellants. The first question certified by the order granting leave to appeal to the defendant John F. Woods should be answered in the negative; the second question thereby certified should be answered in the affirmative. The second question certified by the order granting leave to appeal to the other defendants should be answered in the affirmative; the other questions thereby certified should be answered in the negative.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Crouch and Loughran, JJ., concur; Hgbbs and Finch, JJ., taking no part.

Ordered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.E.2d 451, 271 N.Y. 619, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cotnareanu-v-national-city-bank-of-new-york-ny-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack