Cotnareanu v. National City Bank of New York

3 N.E.2d 451, 271 N.Y. 619, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1340
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 2, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The questions presented on this appeal are identical with the questions in Cotnareanu v. Chase National Bank (271 N. Y. 294), decided herewith. The orders should be modified in accordance with the opinion in that case and, as so modified, affirmed, with separate bills of costs in all courts to the appellants. The first question certified by the order granting leave to appeal to the defendant John F. Woods should be answered in the negative; the second question thereby certified should be answered in the affirmative. The second question certified by the order granting leave to appeal to the other defendants should be answered in the affirmative; the other questions thereby certified should be answered in the negative.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Crouch and Loughran, JJ., concur; Hgbbs and Finch, JJ., taking no part.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cotnareanu v. National City Bank of New York, 3 N.E.2d 451, 271 N.Y. 619, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1340 (N.Y. 1936).

3 N.E.2d 451 (Cotnareanu v. National City Bank of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haughey v. Haughey
9 N.W.2d 575 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1943)