Cotnareanu v. Chase National Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cotnareanu v. Chase National Bank

246 A.D. 573

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Order, so far as appealed from, granting plaintiffs’ motion to strike out the first, second, third, fourth and fifth defenses contained in the amended answer of defendants-appellants, on the ground of insufficiency, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Glennon, JJ.; O’Malley, J., dissents as to the first and third defenses in the amended answer of said defendants and votes to reverse the order appealed from in so far as the same strikes out said defenses, and to deny the motion to strike out said defenses.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, so far as appealed from, granting plaintiffs’ motion to strike out the first, second, third, fourth and fifth defenses contained in the amended answer of defendants-appellants, on the ground of insufficiency, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Glennon, JJ.; O’Malley, J., dissents as to the first and third defenses in the amended answer of said defendants and votes to reverse the order appealed from in so far as the same strikes out said defenses, and to deny the motion to strike out said defenses.

Cotnareanu v. Chase National Bank, 246 A.D. 573 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 573 (Cotnareanu v. Chase National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.