Cotnareanu v. Chase National Bank

246 A.D. 573

This text of 246 A.D. 573 (Cotnareanu v. Chase National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cotnareanu v. Chase National Bank, 246 A.D. 573 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Order, so far as appealed from, granting plaintiffs’ motion to strike out the first, second, third, fourth and fifth defenses contained in the amended answer of defendants-appellants, on the ground of insufficiency, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Glennon, JJ.; O’Malley, J., dissents as to the first and third defenses in the amended answer of said defendants and votes to reverse the order appealed from in so far as the same strikes out said defenses, and to deny the motion to strike out said defenses.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D. 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cotnareanu-v-chase-national-bank-nyappdiv-1935.