Cothren v. Atwood

29 A. 13, 63 Conn. 576, 1894 Conn. LEXIS 88
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedFebruary 8, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 29 A. 13 (Cothren v. Atwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cothren v. Atwood, 29 A. 13, 63 Conn. 576, 1894 Conn. LEXIS 88 (Colo. 1894).

Opinion

By the Court :

Under § 1129 of the General Statutes, a party can appeal only from the “judgment of the court in such cause or action.” Such appeal may undoubtedly present for review questions of law arising in the trial; but until there is a judgment rendered there can be no right of appeal. In the case before us the action of the Superior Court in sustaining the defendant’s remonstrance and declining to accept the committee’s report, was nota “judgment” within the meaning of the statute; hence the appeal must be erased from the docket. All concur. Appeal erased from the docket.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Douglas-Mellers v. Windsor Insurance
792 A.2d 899 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2002)
State v. Kemp
1 A.2d 761 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1938)
France v. Munson
192 A. 706 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1937)
Norton v. Shore Line Electric Railway Co.
78 A. 587 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 A. 13, 63 Conn. 576, 1894 Conn. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cothren-v-atwood-conn-1894.