Cothran v. Weir

3 Ala. 24
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1841·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ORMOND, J.

It is supposed that the justice of the peace had no jurisdiction in this case, because the damages arc laid in the County Court at one hundred dollars. It is the amount of the recovery, and not the sum claimed, which settles the question of jurisdiction. But the amount claimed, both before the justice and in the County Court, was less than fifty dollars, and the actual recovery is twenty dollars. The assertion of damages in the declaration, is mere matter of form, and cannot be looked to, to ascertain whether the Court have jurisdiotion or not.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cothran v. Weir, 3 Ala. 24 (Ala. 1841).

3 Ala. 24 (Cothran v. Weir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. Alford
64 Ala. 236 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1879)
Glaze v. Blake
56 Ala. 379 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1876)
Reynolds v. Dismuke
48 Ala. 209 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1872)
Crabtree v. Cliatt
22 Ala. 181 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1853)
Rose v. Thompson
17 Ala. 628 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1850)
Hart v. Turk
15 Ala. 675 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1849)