Cothran v. Knox

17 S.C. 591
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cothran v. Knox. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 S.C. 207
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided May 27, 1882·No. No. 1220·Published

Opinion

1. Referee made his report, which was generally approved by the Circuit Judge, but it was “recommitted to the referee” for reformation in certain specified particulars. On appeal to this court, no modification was directed of this part of the decree, but certain further corrections in the items of the account were ordered (13 S. C. 496). After remittitur filed, the original referee made the changes directed without notice to counsel. Held, that in this there was no error.

2. The referee’s second report was filed more than sixty days after the filing of the Circuit decree and opinion of the Supreme Court, but within sixty days of the filing of the remittitur. Held, that it was in time.

3. To entitle a party to object that the referee has not filed his report within sixty days, such party must give notice before report filed that he elects to end the reference. Deoree of Aldrich, J., affirmed. Opinion by

Mr. Justice Hudson

(sitting [592]*592in the stead, of Mr. Justice McGowan),

May 27th, 1882. W. S.. Monteith, for appellant; W. H. Pa/rlaer, L. W. Perrm, contra-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cothran v. Knox, 17 S.C. 591 (S.C. 1882).

17 S.C. 591 (Cothran v. Knox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.