Cote v. White

Supreme Court of Vermont

Cote v. White

243 A.2d 797, 127 Vt. 210, 1968 Vt. LEXIS 205

DecidedJune 4, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.2d 797 (Cote v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cote v. White, 243 A.2d 797, 127 Vt. 210, 1968 Vt. LEXIS 205 (Vt. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial court, by an order, assessed against the defendant Fitzgerald certain charges and expenses allegedly brought about by the necessity of a mistrial. The matter still stands for rehearing. The assessing order was appealed to this Court without benefit of certification by the lower court. The order is clearly interlocutory and, without the certification required by 17 V.S.A. §2386, we lack jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Davis v. Albany Discount, 125 Vt. 330, 331, 215 A.2d 519; State v. Mahoney, 126 Vt. 258, 259, 227 A.2d 401.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The trial court, by an order, assessed against the defendant Fitzgerald certain charges and expenses allegedly brought about by the necessity of a mistrial. The matter still stands for rehearing. The assessing order was appealed to this Court without benefit of certification by the lower court. The order is clearly interlocutory and, without the certification required by 17 V.S.A. §2386, we lack jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Davis v. Albany Discount, 125 Vt. 330, 331, 215 A.2d 519; State v. Mahoney, 126 Vt. 258, 259, 227 A.2d 401.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.2d 797, 127 Vt. 210, 1968 Vt. LEXIS 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cote-v-white-vt-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack