Cote v. State

711 S.W.2d 240, 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1456
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided September 25, 1985·No. No. 085-85·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction for possession of a controlled substance: Cocaine. Punishment was assessed by the trial court at 3 years incarceration and a $300 fine, both of which were probated.

The conviction was affirmed by the Austin Court of Appeals in a published opinion, Cote v. State, 682 S.W.2d 380 (Tex.App.— Austin, 1984). From this, the Appellant has taken a petition for discretionary review.

We refuse the Appellant’s petition for discretionary review. However, as it is true in every case, refusal of discretionary review by this Court does not constitute an endorsement or adoption of the reasoning or language employed by the Court of Appeals.

The Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cote v. State, 711 S.W.2d 240, 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1456 (Tex. 1985).

711 S.W.2d 240 (Cote v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kohler v. State
713 S.W.2d 141 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)