Cote v. State

571 So. 2d 586, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9802, 1990 WL 211750
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 28, 1990
DocketNo. 90-1005
StatusPublished

This text of 571 So. 2d 586 (Cote v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cote v. State, 571 So. 2d 586, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9802, 1990 WL 211750 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court correctly denied appellant’s motion to suppress. Therefore, we affirm appellant’s conviction of carrying a concealed weapon.

The trial court erred in assessing costs against the insolvent appellant without giving him notice and an opportunity to be heard. We reverse the imposition of costs against appellant upon authority of Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988) and Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

HERSEY, C.J., and WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Mays v. State
519 So. 2d 618 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
571 So. 2d 586, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9802, 1990 WL 211750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cote-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.