Cote v. State
This text of 571 So. 2d 586 (Cote v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court correctly denied appellant’s motion to suppress. Therefore, we affirm appellant’s conviction of carrying a concealed weapon.
The trial court erred in assessing costs against the insolvent appellant without giving him notice and an opportunity to be heard. We reverse the imposition of costs against appellant upon authority of Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988) and Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
571 So. 2d 586, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9802, 1990 WL 211750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cote-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.