Cote v. Judge of Second District Court
This text of 225 Mass. 123 (Cote v. Judge of Second District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This petition for a writ of mandamus was dismissed by the single justice.
No appeal lies from a decision of a justice of this court in a pro[124]*124ceeding at law. Alleged errors of law can be considered only on exceptions or by report. R L. c. 173, § 96, as amended by St. 1906, c. 342, § 2, and St. 1910, c. 555, § 4. Channell v. Judge of Central District Court of Northern Essex, 213 Mass. 78.
It is not improper to add that manifestly no error of law is disclosed on this record.
Order dismissing petition affirmed.
The case was submitted on a brief by the plaintiff.
Crosby, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 Mass. 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cote-v-judge-of-second-district-court-mass-1916.