Cote-Stokes v. Satterthwaite
This text of 598 F. App'x 192 (Cote-Stokes v. Satterthwaite) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Justin Cote-Stokes appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action for failing to comply with the district court’s prior order directing Cote-Stokes to provide the district court with: (1) evidence that he fully exhausted his administrative remedies; and (2) a signed consent to collection of fees from his prison trust account. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cote-Stokes v. Satterthwaite, No. 1:14-cv-01039-TSE-JFA (E.D.Va. Dec. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
598 F. App'x 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cote-stokes-v-satterthwaite-ca4-2015.