Cotchett v. Savannah & Tybee Railway Co.
11 S.E. 553, 84 Ga. 687
Opinion
In this case the court awarded a nonsuit. The plain[690] tift excepted, and says that this was error. We are of the opinion that the court committed error in awarding a nonsuit in this case; that the same should.have been submitted to a jury. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cotchett v. Savannah & Tybee Railway Co., 11 S.E. 553, 84 Ga. 687 (Ga. 1890).
11 S.E. 553 (Cotchett v. Savannah & Tybee Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southern Railway Co. v. Whitehead
120 S.E. 700 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Siegel v. Illinois Central Railroad
172 S.W. 420 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1915)
Auld v. Southern Railway Co.
71 S.E. 426 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
Branan v. Southern Railway Co.
68 S.E. 793 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Patillo
101 S.W. 492 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1907)
Newton v. Odom
45 S.E. 105 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1903)
Gardner v. Waycross Air-Line Railroad
25 S.E. 334 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1895)