Cotanche v. Cotanche

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cotanche v. Cotanche

250 A.D. 826, 294 N.Y.S. 572, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9158

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 10, 1937·Published

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the record sufficiently establishes that a separate residence of the plaintiff exists in Cayuga county (Hunt v. Hunt, 72 N. Y. 217; Atherton v. Atherton, 155 id. 129; revd. on other grounds, 181 U. S. 155; Post v. Post, 149 App. Div. 452; Gray v. Gray, 143 N. Y. 354) so as to make Cayuga county a proper county for the trial of this action. All concur. (The order grants defendant’s motion to change place of trial in an action for separation.) Present — Sears, P. J., Thompson, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the record sufficiently establishes that a separate residence of the plaintiff exists in Cayuga county (Hunt v. Hunt, 72 N. Y. 217; Atherton v. Atherton, 155 id. 129; revd. on other grounds, 181 U. S. 155; Post v. Post, 149 App. Div. 452; Gray v. Gray, 143 N. Y. 354) so as to make Cayuga county a proper county for the trial of this action. All concur. (The order grants defendant’s motion to change place of trial in an action for separation.) Present — Sears, P. J., Thompson, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.

Cotanche v. Cotanche, 250 A.D. 826, 294 N.Y.S. 572, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9158 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

250 A.D. 826 (Cotanche v. Cotanche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related