Costner v. Wab8992 Tr.
This text of Costner v. Wab8992 Tr. (Costner v. Wab8992 Tr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
GARY COSTNER, No. 84202 Appellant, vs. WABA8992 TRUST, FILED Respondent. MAR 1 5 2022 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying motions in a matter arising in justice court. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Tara D. Clark Newberry, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. The district courts have final appellate jurisdiction over cases arising in the justice courts. Nev, Const. art. 6, § 6; see also Waugh v. Casazza, 85 Nev. 520, 521, 458 P.2d 359, 360 (1969). Accordingly, this court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, and therefore ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Silver
PiekA Cadish Pickering
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(I )) I 947A 07- ago20q cc: Hon. Tara D. Clark Newberry, District Judge Gary Costner WABA8992 Trust Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT oç NEVADA
10) 1V47A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Costner v. Wab8992 Tr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/costner-v-wab8992-tr-nev-2022.