Costine v. St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical Center

173 A.D.2d 422
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 30, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 173 A.D.2d 422 (Costine v. St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Costine v. St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical Center, 173 A.D.2d 422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Dontzin, J.), entered on July 17, 1990, which, inter alia, confirmed the findings of a Referee that validated service upon defendant O’Leary, unanimously affirmed, with costs to plaintiff.

In attempting to effect service at defendant’s home, a process server was stopped by a man at a security booth outside the private residential community in which defendant lives. The process server stated that he had legal papers for defendant. The guard, who identified himself as a superintendent, told the server he could not proceed, but that he (the guard) would forward the papers to defendant. The process server handed him the papers, which were addressed to defendant and were marked as containing legal material. By screening the visitor and representing that he would pass along the legal papers to defendant resident, the guard exhibited sufficient maturity and responsibility under the circumstances. (See, City of New York v Chemical Bank, 122 Misc 2d 104.) Service at that location was proper because the outer bounds of defendant’s actual dwelling place were deemed to extend to the security booth, the point at which the process server’s progress was arrested. (See, duPont, Glore Forgan & Co. v Chen, 41 NY2d 794.)

The finding of defective service upon defendant’s wife was not preserved for review by cross-motion before the referring IAS Justice. In any event, on the merits, the Referee’s credi[423]*423bility findings on that matter should not be disturbed. Concur —Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Wallach, Ross and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Citimortgage, Inc. v. Leitman
2024 NY Slip Op 05955 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Xiao Hong Wang v. Chi Kei Li
2019 NY Slip Op 1362 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Citibank, N.A. v. Balsamo
2016 NY Slip Op 7920 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Ahluwalia v. St. George's University, LLC
63 F. Supp. 3d 251 (E.D. New York, 2014)
Ascencio-Sutphen v. McDonald's Corp.
16 Misc. 3d 184 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)
Sartor v. Utica Taxi Center, Inc.
260 F. Supp. 2d 670 (S.D. New York, 2003)
(2001)
86 Op. Att'y Gen. 42 (Maryland Attorney General Reports, 2001)
Houss v. Dachowitz
255 A.D.2d 491 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Charnin v. Cogan
250 A.D.2d 513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Rosenberg v. Haddad
208 A.D.2d 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Duffy v. St. Vincent's Hospital
198 A.D.2d 31 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Board of Managers of Le Trianon Condominium v. 1439 Realty Corp.
186 A.D.2d 437 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Farina v. Brenner
155 Misc. 2d 96 (New York Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 A.D.2d 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/costine-v-st-vincents-hospital-medical-center-nyappdiv-1991.