Costikyan v. Jacobson

280 A.D.2d 272, 719 N.Y.S.2d 856, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 898
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 1, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order, denominated decision and judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered on or about July 17, 2000, which denied petitioner customers’ application for an attachment in aid of an arbitration they brought against respondent stockbroker, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The attachment was properly denied without a hearing, there being no issues of fact raised as to respondent’s financial condition and prospects, and no facts adduced to support petitioners’ claim that respondent will secrete, dissipate- or otherwise squander his assets (cf., County Natwest Sec. Corp. v Jesup, Josephthal & Co., 180 AD2d 468). Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Andrias, Wallach, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Costikyan v. Jacobson, 280 A.D.2d 272, 719 N.Y.S.2d 856, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

280 A.D.2d 272 (Costikyan v. Jacobson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sullivan & Worcester LLP v. Takieddine
73 A.D.3d 442 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Spiegel v. D.H. Blair & Co.
289 A.D.2d 22 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)