Costigan v. New York & Stamford Railway Co.

174 A.D. 917, 160 N.Y.S. 1127
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Costigan v. New York & Stamford Railway Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 160 A.D. 597

Opinion

Order affirmed, costs to abide the event. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Costigan v. New York & Stamford Railway Co., 174 A.D. 917, 160 N.Y.S. 1127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

174 A.D. 917 (Costigan v. New York & Stamford Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.