Coster v. Watson
15 Johns. 535
Opinion
It is a general rule of the Court of K. B. that no attorney of that, or any other court, shall he bail, in any action depending in that court. (1 Tidd's Pr. 230.) The same rule prevails, also, in the Court of C. B. (1 Taunt. Rep. 164. note.) There appears to be good reason for the rule, and we, therefore, adopt it. The motion is granted.
The counsel for the parties agreed, that the rule should be, that the sheriff put in other sufficient bail, in four days, or that an attachment issue against him.
Rule accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coster v. Watson, 15 Johns. 535 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1818).
15 Johns. 535 (Coster v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Banks v. McDivitt
2 F. Cas. 759 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1875)
Miles v. Clarke
2 Bosw. 709 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1859)