Coster v. Watson

New York Supreme Court

Coster v. Watson

15 Johns. 535

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1818

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 15 Johns. 535 (Coster v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coster v. Watson, 15 Johns. 535 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1818).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is a general rule of the Court of K. B. that no attorney of that, or any other court, shall he bail, in any action depending in that court. (1 Tidd's Pr. 230.) The same rule prevails, also, in the Court of C. B. (1 Taunt. Rep. 164. note.) There appears to be good reason for the rule, and we, therefore, adopt it. The motion is granted.

The counsel for the parties agreed, that the rule should be, that the sheriff put in other sufficient bail, in four days, or that an attachment issue against him.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It is a general rule of the Court of K. B. that no attorney of that, or any other court, shall he bail, in any action depending in that court. (1 Tidd's Pr. 230.) The same rule prevails, also, in the Court of C. B. (1 Taunt. Rep. 164. note.) There appears to be good reason for the rule, and we, therefore, adopt it. The motion is granted.

The counsel for the parties agreed, that the rule should be, that the sheriff put in other sufficient bail, in four days, or that an attachment issue against him.

Rule accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Johns. 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coster-v-watson-nysupct-1818.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack