Coster v. Waring

19 Wend. 97
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1838·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

The sole object of the 88th rule was to regulate the costs of amendment after demurrer. We cannot look into the pleadings, on a motion of this kind, in a case circumstanced like the present. If the plaintiff’s attorney considered the demurrer frivolous, he should have moved for judgment on that ground.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coster v. Waring, 19 Wend. 97 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1838).

19 Wend. 97 (Coster v. Waring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gill v. Stebbins
10 F. Cas. 379 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1828)