Coster v. Phœnix

New York Supreme Court

Coster v. Phœnix

7 Cow. 524

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1827

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 Cow. 524 (Coster v. Phœnix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coster v. Phœnix, 7 Cow. 524 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

Pincite

Opinion

Curia.

The rights of bail may often be affected more or less, by an amendment which prevents the reversal of a judgment on error. It is not for them to object. The bail for the limits could not take advantage of this error in any way without the intervention of the defendant. It is personal to the latter in every particular. The amendment is fully justified by the authorities cited for the defendant in error; and must be granted. But it is on paying the costs of this motion and the writ of error.

Buie accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curia.

The rights of bail may often be affected more or less, by an amendment which prevents the reversal of a judgment on error. It is not for them to object. The bail for the limits could not take advantage of this error in any way without the intervention of the defendant. It is personal to the latter in every particular. The amendment is fully justified by the authorities cited for the defendant in error; and must be granted. But it is on paying the costs of this motion and the writ of error.

Buie accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Cow. 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coster-v-phnix-nysupct-1827.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack