Coster v. Phœnix

7 Cow. 524
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1827·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Curia.

The rights of bail may often be affected more or less, by an amendment which prevents the reversal of a judgment on error. It is not for them to object. The bail for the limits could not take advantage of this error in any way without the intervention of the defendant. It is personal to the latter in every particular. The amendment is fully justified by the authorities cited for the defendant in error; and must be granted. But it is on paying the costs of this motion and the writ of error.

Buie accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coster v. Phœnix, 7 Cow. 524 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

7 Cow. 524 (Coster v. Phœnix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. The Cadmus
4 F. Cas. 360 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1856)