Costello v. State
Opinion
[485] ORDER
Keith Costello, II appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Johnson v. State, 406 S.W.3d 892, 898 (Mo. banc 2013). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
424 S.W.3d 484 (Costello v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.