Costello v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Costello v. State

424 S.W.3d 484, 2014 WL 1016947, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 310

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 18, 2014

DocketNo. ED 99766

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 424 S.W.3d 484 (Costello v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Costello v. State, 424 S.W.3d 484, 2014 WL 1016947, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 310 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

[485]*485 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Keith Costello, II appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Johnson v. State, 406 S.W.3d 892, 898 (Mo. banc 2013). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[485]*485 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Keith Costello, II appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Johnson v. State, 406 S.W.3d 892, 898 (Mo. banc 2013). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

424 S.W.3d 484, 2014 WL 1016947, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/costello-v-state-moctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack