Costello Bros. v. Pawtucket Institution for Savings (In re Melino Cigar & Candy Co.)

22 B.R. 703, 7 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 71, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 3447, 9 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 665
CourtDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island
DecidedAugust 26, 1982
DocketBankruptcy No. 8100379; Adv. No. 810213
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 22 B.R. 703 (Costello Bros. v. Pawtucket Institution for Savings (In re Melino Cigar & Candy Co.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Costello Bros. v. Pawtucket Institution for Savings (In re Melino Cigar & Candy Co.), 22 B.R. 703, 7 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 71, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 3447, 9 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 665 (D.R.I. 1982).

Opinion

ARTHUR N. VOTOLATO, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

The question for determination is whether a guarantor’s payment on a surety bond for cigarette tax stamp liability constitutes a priority administrative expense pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)l(B) and § 507(a)(1).

A brief recital of the facts is helpful. On April 6,1981 Melino Cigar & Candy Company, Inc. sold cigarettes, cigars, candy, etc. to the Plaintiff, Costello Bros., Inc. Costello took partial delivery on April 18, 1981 and transferred the merchandise to its’ warehouse, where it was co-mingled with Costello’s inventory. Thereafter, Costello learned that the merchandise purchased from Meli-no was subject to a security interest, as well as a number of claims for reclamation by Melino’s suppliers. On April 23, 1981, Costello notified Melino that it was rescinding the April 6 agreement, and offered to return similar merchandise or equivalent cash, provided Melino could prove that it was the owner of the merchandise in question. Nothing took place as a result of the April 23 notice.

An involuntary Chapter 7 petition was filed against Melino on May 8,1981, and the order for relief was entered on June 29, 1981. Costello filed the instant complaint on July 14, 1981, asking that the Court determine the ownership question. In the meantime, to avoid spoilage, Costello sold most of the merchandise (for $95,000), and deposited the funds in an interest-bearing custodian account.

On January 30, 1982, National Grange Mutual Insurance Company was granted leave to intervene as a Defendant, in order to obtain a determination of its interest in the proceeds of 4,293 cartons of cigarettes which were part of the sale from Melino to Costello. National Grange had guaranteed Melino’s liability for the payment of cigarette taxes to the State of Rhode Island, and after the order for relief was entered, National Grange became primarily liable on the State’s tax claim and paid the same pursuant to its bond.

In this proceeding National Grange claims priority creditor status as to the proceeds from the sale of cigarettes which were stamped before the sale to Costello, to the extent1 that those proceeds represent taxes collected by Costello from sales to its customers. National Grange contends that “collection” of these taxes, which “occurred during the administration of the estate,” constitutes an administrative expense pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B) and § 507(a)(1),2 and asserts its alleged priority status as subrogee of the Rhode Island Division of Taxation. See National Grange’s Memorandum at Pp. 36.

Since the secured party, the various reclaiming creditors, and the trustee have already negotiated a settlement of their respective claims, all parties agreed to address only the issue of National Grange’s claim.

Section 503(b)(1)(B), under which National Grange claims administrative expense [705]*705status, provides for payment as an administrative expense, any tax which was incurred by the estate. For the following reasons, the claim in question does not qualify for priority status. Distributors and dealers purchase tax stamps from the State Tax Administrator and are required to affix them to cigarette packages before they are sold to retailers and, in turn, to consumers. These stamps can be purchased in one of two ways. Stamps may be purchased for cash, or on 30-day credit if the distributor provides a surety bond. R.I.Gen.Law § 44-20-9. As a result, cigarettes are often sold to dealers and reach the retail market before the stamps have actually been paid for by the distributor.

The Defendant’s argument fails because it is predicated upon the incorrect assumption that consumers/smokers would be liable for said taxes should the distributor default on its obligation to the State. To the contrary, however, once stamps are affixed to cigarettes, whether those stamps were paid for or purchased on credit, the tax is deemed to be paid with respect to all subsequent purchasers of the goods in question,3 and the State’s claim for unpaid taxes is limited to the purchaser of the stamps.4 In no event could there be any liability on the part of either retailers or consumers. In this case the stamps were purchased and affixed to the cigarettes before the petition was filed. Since the tax liability in question was incurred at the time the stamps were purchased, no tax was or could have been incurred by the estate thereafter.

The claim in question fails to qualify as an administrative expense for yet another reason. 11 U.S.C. §§ 503(b)l(B), 507 (a)6(E)(ii).5 Section 503(b)l(B) excludes payment, as an administrative expense, of an excise tax on “a transaction occurring during the three years immediately preceding the date of the filing of the petition.” Since it is undisputed that the stamps were affixed during the three years preceding the filing date, the tax in question is not an administrative expense. § 503(b)l(B).

For the reasons discussed above, National Grange’s claim for administrative expense status must be denied. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re: Mary C. Benafel
Ninth Circuit, 2011
Ahlburn v. Clark
728 A.2d 449 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1999)
In Re Pub Dennis of Cumberland, Inc.
142 B.R. 38 (D. Rhode Island, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 B.R. 703, 7 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 71, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 3447, 9 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/costello-bros-v-pawtucket-institution-for-savings-in-re-melino-cigar-rid-1982.