Costell v. Costell

66 A. 1134, 69 N.J. Eq. 832, 3 Robb. 832, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 148
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 5, 1906·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Grey.

[833]*833For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Gray, Dill—13.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Costell v. Costell, 66 A. 1134, 69 N.J. Eq. 832, 3 Robb. 832, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 148 (N.J. 1906).

66 A. 1134 (Costell v. Costell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.