Costecski v. Skarulis

131 A. 398, 103 Conn. 762
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedDecember 5, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 131 A. 398 (Costecski v. Skarulis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Costecski v. Skarulis, 131 A. 398, 103 Conn. 762 (Colo. 1925).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was brought by plaintiff in the City Court of New Haven where he had judgment, from which defendant appealed to the Superior Court. In connection with this appeal the time for filing notice of same was extended by the City Court on defendant’s motion, and when the action reached the Superior Court, the plaintiff plead in abatement to the appeal attacking the right of the City Court to extend the time for filing notice of appeal. To this plea defendant demurred, and her demurrer was sustained. Thereupon plaintiff appealed to this court from this decision. The appeal has no standing in this court. There was no judgment of the Superior Court, much less a final judgment. After the sustaining of the demurrer to the plea by the Superior Court, the action remained rightfully pending there and to be thereafter heard upon its merits, upon the pleadings *763 in the court below, or upon such amended pleadings as might legally be filed. Appeal to this court must be from a final judgment. The appeal should be dismissed and erased from the docket of this court.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campbell v. Town of Plymouth
811 A.2d 243 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2002)
McInerney v. Cecio Bros.
457 A.2d 303 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1983)
Breen v. Phelps
439 A.2d 1066 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1982)
Guerin v. Norton
355 A.2d 255 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1974)
Lowe v. Wasley Buick Oldsmobile, Inc.
277 A.2d 724 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1971)
Varanelli v. Luddy
42 A.2d 656 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1945)
State v. Kemp
1 A.2d 761 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1938)
France v. Munson
192 A. 706 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1937)
Beach v. Beach Hotel Corporation
163 A. 416 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 A. 398, 103 Conn. 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/costecski-v-skarulis-conn-1925.