Costas v. Marmarellis
This text of 200 Misc. 912 (Costas v. Marmarellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint sets forth a good cause of action to recover gifts, or their value, alleged to have been made conditionally by plaintiffs to defendant in contemplation of her marriage to plaintiffs’ son. Such an action is not barred by article 2-A of the Civil Practice Act. It was therefore error to dismiss the plaintiffs ’ complaint for legal insufficiency.
The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements to plaintiffs, and motion to dismiss the complaint denied, with $10 costs.
Fennelly, Hooley and Walsh, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 Misc. 912, 111 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/costas-v-marmarellis-nyappterm-1951.