Costas v. Marmarellis

200 Misc. 912, 111 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2834
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 20, 1951·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The complaint sets forth a good cause of action to recover gifts, or their value, alleged to have been made conditionally by plaintiffs to defendant in contemplation of her marriage to plaintiffs’ son. Such an action is not barred by article 2-A of the Civil Practice Act. It was therefore error to dismiss the plaintiffs ’ complaint for legal insufficiency.

The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements to plaintiffs, and motion to dismiss the complaint denied, with $10 costs.

Fennelly, Hooley and Walsh, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Costas v. Marmarellis, 200 Misc. 912, 111 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

200 Misc. 912 (Costas v. Marmarellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeFina v. Scott
195 Misc. 2d 75 (New York Supreme Court, 2003)
Bruno v. Guerra
146 Misc. 2d 206 (New York Supreme Court, 1990)
Goldstein v. Rosenthal
56 Misc. 2d 311 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1968)