Costanzo v. Schwedler
This text of 14 A.D.2d 814 (Costanzo v. Schwedler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant’s motion to dismiss was made some 15 months after the joinder of issue. In opposition to the motion, plaintiff submitted only the affidavit of his attorney stating that a bill of particulars and a note of issue had just been served. No affidavit setting forth the merits of the action was submitted; and no attempt was made to explain or justify the delay or to show that it was not unreasonable. In our opinion, upon such a showing there was no basis for the exercise of discretion to deny the motion to dismiss. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 A.D.2d 814, 221 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/costanzo-v-schwedler-nyappdiv-1961.