Costanzo v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc.
560 So. 2d 265, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2413, 1990 WL 41511
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 1990·No. No. 88-0900·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Reversed and remanded for a new trial. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in allowing appellees to bolster the credibility of its expert witness by the use of a medical treatise, and in admitting improper impeachment evidence against one of appellant’s medical experts. See Chorzelewski v. Drucker, 546 So.2d 1118 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); 3-M Corp.—McGhan Med. Reports v. Brown, 475 So.2d 994 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Costanzo v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc., 560 So. 2d 265, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2413, 1990 WL 41511 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
560 So. 2d 265 (Costanzo v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Donshik v. Sherman
861 So. 2d 53 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)