Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Costanzo v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc.

Costanzo v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc.

560 So. 2d 265, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2413, 1990 WL 41511
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 11, 1990
DocketNo. 88-0900
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 560 So. 2d 265 (Costanzo v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Costanzo v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc., 560 So. 2d 265, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2413, 1990 WL 41511 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in allowing appellees to bolster the credibility of its expert witness by the use of a medical treatise, and in admitting improper impeachment evidence against one of appellant’s medical experts. See Chorzelewski v. Drucker, 546 So.2d 1118 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); 3-M Corp.—McGhan Med. Reports v. Brown, 475 So.2d 994 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. LETTS, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donshik v. Sherman
861 So. 2d 53 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
560 So. 2d 265, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2413, 1990 WL 41511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/costanzo-v-agency-rent-a-car-inc-fladistctapp-1990.