Costantini v. Costantini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Costantini v. Costantini

5 A.D.2d 890, 172 N.Y.S.2d 627, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6416

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 890 (Costantini v. Costantini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Costantini v. Costantini, 5 A.D.2d 890, 172 N.Y.S.2d 627, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6416 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to enjoin defendants from using “Hershey’s” or “Hershey’s lee Cream” in the sale of ice cream or ice cream products in the State of New York, and for other relief, a counterclaim was interposed to enjoin plaintiff [891]*891from using “Hershey” or “Hershey’s” in the sale of said products in the United States. Plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment entered after trial as dismissed the complaint, and defendants appeal from so much of said judgment as dismissed their counterclaims. Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

[4 Misc 2d 812.] Present—-Beldoek, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to enjoin defendants from using “Hershey’s” or “Hershey’s lee Cream” in the sale of ice cream or ice cream products in the State of New York, and for other relief, a counterclaim was interposed to enjoin plaintiff [891]*891from using “Hershey” or “Hershey’s” in the sale of said products in the United States. Plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment entered after trial as dismissed the complaint, and defendants appeal from so much of said judgment as dismissed their counterclaims. Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

[4 Misc 2d 812.] Present—-Beldoek, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 890, 172 N.Y.S.2d 627, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/costantini-v-costantini-nyappdiv-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack