Costa v. Schenectady Railway Co.

218 A.D. 756

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for change of venue granted. (See Saal Products Sales, Inc., v. Schatz Manufacturing Co., 216 App. Div. 544; Viertels v. New York, Ontario & Western R. Co., 182 id. 92; [757]*757Larkin v. Watson Wagon Co., 68 id. 86.) Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Finch, MeAvoy and Martin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Costa v. Schenectady Railway Co., 218 A.D. 756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

218 A.D. 756 (Costa v. Schenectady Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saal Products Sales, Inc. v. Schatz Manufacturing Co.
216 A.D. 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)