Cossio v. State
Opinions
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
On consideration of the appellant’s motion for rehearing, 'the court grants the motion, withdraws the per curiam affir-mance, and substitutes the following in its place.
This is an appeal of an order on the motion of defendant-appellant to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), claiming entitlement to additional credit for time served.
Defendant claims that he was arrested on January 17, 2008, in Miami-Dade County for a crime committed in Miami-Dade County. He alleges that he was also arrested at that time on an outstanding warrant for violation of probation (“VOP”) issued in Monroe County. Upon disposition of the VOP, the trial court in Monroe County awarded defendant credit for time served for part of the time defendant was in jail in Miami-Dade County, stating that he was not arrested on the VOP warrant until April 30, 2008.
Because the record now before us fails to conclusively refute the appellant’s claim, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the postconviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D) (requiring reversal by this court unless the record shows conclusively that the defendant is entitled to no relief).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
At the time of sentencing, the court granted credit for time served from April 22, 2008. The reason for the April 22 date is not clear, but is immaterial. The defendant claims his credit should run from January 17.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
10 So. 3d 689 (Cossio v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.